Before
Lit Civ 2, I had never read a word of Thoreau or Emerson, or at least had no
recollection of it. However, judging by the almost unanimous negative reaction
when they were brought up in class, it sounds like an experience I wouldn’t
have forgotten. I’m not sure how I made it through high school without being
exposed to these writers, but I am glad I finally read them in this class.
Maybe it was because we read them in small doses via short passages and not a
full work, but I actually enjoyed the passages from Walden and Self-Reliance. Sure,
the selections were tough to decipher after the first read, but they made me
think. They made me ponder my way of life and if I should be doing something
differently. I don’t necessarily agree with everything they say, but they do
make many valid points.
One
viewpoint that stood out to me was the idea that you shouldn’t take any advice
from other people or imitate in any way. A passage from Walden reads, “Practically,
the old have no very important advice to give the young, their own experience
has been so partial, and their lives have been such miserable failures.” I take
advice from my elders all the time. I value the input of my parents and
grandparents because they have a lot more experience in this thing called life.
I don’t agree with Emerson when he is essentially saying that old people who
give advice are failures. I understand learning on my own is important, but there
a lot in this world I wouldn’t know if it weren’t for my elders. Perhaps
Emerson is suggesting that I would have discovered these things on my own
anyway.
This
ties into the next point about not trying to replicate what others do; Thoreau
says, “Insist on yourself, never imitate.” I struggle with this concept a
little bit too. I am a member of the Chancellor’s Leadership Program in which
we learn about the Social Change Model, ethical leadership, and general way to
help us become better leaders. One article we read is entitled “The Power of
Full Engagement,” and it essentially outlines different ways to maximize your
daily amount of energy. For example, one tactic is to fully engage yourself for
short periods of time then fully disengaging to seek renewal before jumping
back into it; basically sprinting instead of running a marathon. The article
also advises drinking plenty of water. In essence, if I implemented these ideas
in my daily routine, wouldn’t that be imitating? If I apply proven methods that
could improve the way I live that someone else thought of first, am I
imitating?
I don’t
think that Emerson and Thoreau would have approved of this because they would
have believed it better if I figure out my own methods instead of using those
of others. They surely would not have purchased any self-help books either. But
I agree and disagree; I think it is beneficial to try the methods suggested in
the article, but adapt them to what fits you best. Basically using the ideas as
a guideline more than a strict rule.
Another
point made in the article that clashes with the views of these authors is the
notion of “positive rituals.” The idea here is to do more basic and fundamental
everyday actions on autopilot to conserve as much energy as possible for
creative, enriching, and thus more demanding actions. Both Thoreau and Emerson
speak about foolish consistencies and how easy it is for us to make a beaten
path for ourselves. Although they’re probably referring to blindly following
society’s traditions, I think they may have had something to say about these
positive rituals. I believe they would have emphasized always being conscious
and looking into oneself instead of putting your life on autopilot.
Overall,
I think Thoreau and Emerson make many valid points about blindly following
society. One should truly be an individual and not succumb to senseless
traditions. I just thought it was interesting how what I am learning today
clashes with what they wrote about. And it makes me think: who is correct? I am
not a true transcendentalist, but I do see myself implementing several of their
ideas into my everyday life.
No comments:
Post a Comment